Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: jer@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 00:29:08
Message-Id: 20140512022853.4084afca@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Mon, 12 May 2014 02:14:52 +0200
2 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, 11 May 2014 20:15:39 +0200
5 > Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:52:07 +0200
8 > > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
9 > >
10 > > > And to me it looks remarkably like you were throwing the book at
11 > > > someone while assuming a "[QA]" role. It doesn't look like that's
12 > > > working out too well.
13 > >
14 > > Well, no, in this case the "documented in gentoo-core in 2007" book
15 > > is thrown at QA; doesn't work too well, when we can't even read that
16 > > book.
17 >
18 > Well, no. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509962#c3
19
20 That's working out well; it is according to "The QA team is also tasked
21 with the authority to ensure tree policies are respected." as stated in
22 GLEP 48. If that doesn't work for you, please suggest a fix to GLEP 48.
23
24 --
25 With kind regards,
26
27 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
28 Gentoo Developer
29
30 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
31 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
32 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>