1 |
On Mon, 12 May 2014 02:14:52 +0200 |
2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, 11 May 2014 20:15:39 +0200 |
5 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:52:07 +0200 |
8 |
> > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > > And to me it looks remarkably like you were throwing the book at |
11 |
> > > someone while assuming a "[QA]" role. It doesn't look like that's |
12 |
> > > working out too well. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Well, no, in this case the "documented in gentoo-core in 2007" book |
15 |
> > is thrown at QA; doesn't work too well, when we can't even read that |
16 |
> > book. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Well, no. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509962#c3 |
19 |
|
20 |
That's working out well; it is according to "The QA team is also tasked |
21 |
with the authority to ensure tree policies are respected." as stated in |
22 |
GLEP 48. If that doesn't work for you, please suggest a fix to GLEP 48. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
With kind regards, |
26 |
|
27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
28 |
Gentoo Developer |
29 |
|
30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |