Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] pre-GLEP: Gentoo Developer status
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:17:34
Message-Id: CAGDaZ_rhQymEdSRS2mXLk8P68Me1gZrdkvYN9z2F9K=A7p1WiA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] pre-GLEP: Gentoo Developer status by Daniel Robbins
1 Would there be some sort of dependency-like issues if bylaws were made
2 that referenced or used terms that themselves were not in the bylaws?
3
4 Like, for example, do the words council, developer, etc need
5 themselves defined in the bylaws?
6
7 On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote:
8 > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
9 >>
10 >> Hi,
11 >>
12 >> Here's a quick pre-GLEP for review. It's a supplement to GLEP 39
13 >
14 >
15 > I think that modifications to GLEP 39 need to be placed on hold until there
16 > is a clear relationship defined to the Foundation.
17 >
18 > GLEP 39 has a number of problems but we need to tackle the highest-priority
19 > issues first.
20 >
21 > -Daniel