| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:57 AM Andreas K. Huettel |
| 2 |
<dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Tell us why you are the |
| 5 |
> > reporter of most ComRel bugs in last 3 years and are even subject of |
| 6 |
> > most bugs filed by others. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Err... how did you arrive at that? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm in council and not in comrel anymore, and I haven't seen any kind of |
| 11 |
> statistics (nor any bugs since my comrel access has been removed long ago). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Frankly, if statistics like this do exist they shouldn't be the |
| 15 |
subject of public discussion on lists. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
An anonymous histogram on #of complaints for any dev might be |
| 18 |
interesting. (ie 5 unnamed devs had 3 complaints, 1 dev had 14, etc). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
However, unless we shift to a model where comrel complaints are public |
| 21 |
we shouldn't have people divulging information about how many |
| 22 |
complaints (qualitatively or quantitatively) any particular dev has |
| 23 |
filed or been the subject of. Nobody should even know that somebody |
| 24 |
has been the subject of a complaint. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Everybody already sees how most devs conduct themselves in public as |
| 27 |
it is, they can judge for themselves if they are concerned with this. |
| 28 |
If somebody has been a menace in private comrel should be dealing with |
| 29 |
that outside the court of public opinion. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Rich |
Archives