Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:02:24
Message-Id: 50A29436.7050308@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization by Fabian Groffen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 13/11/12 01:08 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
5 > On 13-11-2012 12:48:06 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
6 >>> Do you see the word "vote" in there? (It isn't in there on
7 >>> purpose.)
8 >>
9 >> what's the difference between 'approve/disapprove' and 'vote' ?
10 >> the difference is not clear to me.
11 >
12 > When the council votes on something it becomes policy, or something
13 > like that. In this case I deem that to be unwise given that it
14 > seems very unclear what the full picture on this matter is going to
15 > become.
16 >
17 > Fabian
18 >
19
20 ... Except that is specifically what WilliamH is requesting --
21 policy, that any user planning to use a separate /usr on gentoo for
22 linux be required to either use an initramfs or busybox[sep-usr]; ie,
23 the two methods that allow /usr to be mounted early enough to blur any
24 technical limitations between separating / and /usr (on linux)
25
26 Right?
27 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
29
30 iF4EAREIAAYFAlCilDYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBAkgEAhE53uckuLwWZ52NLLyzgKeM6
31 mZgqWhhqbc4qYWb/EjgA/1E/vL7hb9wF+iAtKs/IFjjOSjN0rJ6CXPY4w8qCyIq1
32 =hRmD
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization Rich Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>