1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Pavlos Ratis <dastergon@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> Recently I found that there's a new research on Gentoo, specifically |
5 |
>> for Portage and package dependencies[1]. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Thanks for pointing this out! Anybody know anything about their first |
8 |
> reference, also from 2014? As far as I can tell it hasn't been |
9 |
> published yet but I figured I'd ask here before I go bugging the |
10 |
> authors. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
I found this after googling: |
14 |
|
15 |
http://essay.utwente.nl/61920/1/Remco_Bloemen_-_Innovation_Dynamics_in_Open_Source_Software.pdf |
16 |
|
17 |
It is a more interesting read compared to the paper. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Interesting that they picked Gentoo. It might just be from |
20 |
> familiarity, but a reason to use Gentoo is that the dependency info |
21 |
> for a package is separated from the actual distfiles/etc. Many other |
22 |
> package formats combine these, though perhaps this data is cached |
23 |
> somewhere in a format that could be used historically. If they had |
24 |
> multiple GB of ebuild files I'd hate to think about what that would |
25 |
> look like as .debs. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Rich |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Vikraman |