1 |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 18/07/14 05:06, Richard Yao wrote: |
4 |
>> I felt that posting a platform before someone asked would be |
5 |
>> inappropriate, so I made the conscious decision to wait for a |
6 |
>> single person to ask before posting anything. No one asked, so I |
7 |
>> posted nothing. |
8 |
> People are likely inclined to take this as either arrogance or |
9 |
> nonchalance -- i.e. like you could take a council position or leave |
10 |
> it. Please post something next time. You will likely be higher on my |
11 |
> list if you will. |
12 |
|
13 |
Live and learn... |
14 |
|
15 |
Don't take rankings too personally. The algorithm has to stick |
16 |
something at the top, and something at the bottom, and it isn't like |
17 |
we have tons of dead wood on the ballot. Having somebody who |
18 |
genuinely cares about Gentoo and wants to contribute coming in last |
19 |
was a fairly likely outcome as a result. |
20 |
|
21 |
Definitely don't take election results as some kind of judgement of |
22 |
the work you're doing. Writing ebuilds, designing package managers, |
23 |
being on Comrel, being a Trustee, being on Infra, and being on QA are |
24 |
all very different roles - just to pick some examples. People look |
25 |
for different things when voting about one vs the other. Also, most |
26 |
who were elected were incumbents, and not being an incumbent isn't |
27 |
something that anybody new can do anything about. |
28 |
|
29 |
Just keep doing good work! The nice thing about Gentoo is that |
30 |
anybody who wants to step up and take things in a new direction can do |
31 |
so fairly easily as long as it doesn't impact the average experience. |
32 |
|
33 |
Rich |