Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Manuel Rüger" <mrueg@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:49:33
Message-Id: a0a81c9e-f2ff-ae39-0dc6-5f0f887c8481@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29 by Ulrich Mueller
On 14.07.2018 20:38, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018, Manuel Rüger wrote: > >> On 14.07.2018 19:33, William Hubbs wrote: >>> I'm not sure this is an agenda item since there is really nothing >>> for us to do for it in a meeting; [...] > >> In my opinion there is still a difference between implicit and >> explicit agreement to a CoC, as explicit agreeement makes knowledge >> about the CoC undeniable. > > I agree with William here. > > If this is addressed at the council, then the council has explicitly > approved the CoC in its 2007-03-15 meeting [1]. Usually we don't > reiterate past decisions for the sole purpose of confirming them. > I also think there is no doubt that the CoC is in force. > > However, if your request is addressed at council members as > individuals, then it is not an agenda item. (Of course, council > members can still make a statement as requested.) > > Ulrich > > [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20070315.txt >
Okay understood. Would that be a better fit for the council meeting then? Have the council vote the following items: a) Make explicit agreement with CoC mandatory for being part (i.e. also existing members) of Comrel, Infra, Recruiters and QA. b) In concordance with a) make explicit agreement an (unenforced) part of the first Council meeting. Agreements will be tracked in a bug per project by the individual project members. For a) project leads have to ensure that this happens. Thanks, Manuel

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies