1 |
On 14.07.2018 20:38, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018, Manuel Rüger wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On 14.07.2018 19:33, William Hubbs wrote: |
5 |
>>> I'm not sure this is an agenda item since there is really nothing |
6 |
>>> for us to do for it in a meeting; [...] |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> In my opinion there is still a difference between implicit and |
9 |
>> explicit agreement to a CoC, as explicit agreeement makes knowledge |
10 |
>> about the CoC undeniable. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I agree with William here. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If this is addressed at the council, then the council has explicitly |
15 |
> approved the CoC in its 2007-03-15 meeting [1]. Usually we don't |
16 |
> reiterate past decisions for the sole purpose of confirming them. |
17 |
> I also think there is no doubt that the CoC is in force. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> However, if your request is addressed at council members as |
20 |
> individuals, then it is not an agenda item. (Of course, council |
21 |
> members can still make a statement as requested.) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Ulrich |
24 |
> |
25 |
> [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20070315.txt |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Okay understood. Would that be a better fit for the council meeting then? |
29 |
|
30 |
Have the council vote the following items: |
31 |
|
32 |
a) Make explicit agreement with CoC mandatory for being part (i.e. also |
33 |
existing members) of Comrel, Infra, Recruiters and QA. |
34 |
|
35 |
b) In concordance with a) make explicit agreement an (unenforced) part |
36 |
of the first Council meeting. |
37 |
|
38 |
Agreements will be tracked in a bug per project by the individual |
39 |
project members. For a) project leads have to ensure that this happens. |
40 |
|
41 |
Thanks, |
42 |
Manuel |