| 1 |
On 2011.08.14 15:35, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14.08.2011 17:19, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > What do you mean by control ? |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> My proposal is: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> Devrel: 1 year term. Developers are nominated by others or they |
| 9 |
> can |
| 10 |
> >> self-nominated |
| 11 |
> > Why do devrel members need to be developers? |
| 12 |
> > Users with the correct skill set can do the job just as well, if |
| 13 |
> they |
| 14 |
> > are interested. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> And when the users start to do the job they would become developers |
| 18 |
> in the broader sense of the term (for example in many places on our |
| 19 |
> web |
| 20 |
> site Developer means anyone with @gentoo.org email). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Regards, |
| 23 |
> Petteri |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
As I understand your reply, it would be possible for a suitably |
| 27 |
skilled user (no @gentoo.org) to become a member of devrel and for that |
| 28 |
user to become a staff member of Gentoo as a result of joining devrel. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
i.e. there in no requirement to hold a @gentoo.org before getting |
| 31 |
actively involved in devrel. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Regards, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Roy Bamford |
| 37 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 38 |
elections |
| 39 |
gentoo-ops |
| 40 |
forum-mods |
| 41 |
trustees |
Archives