| 1 |
El lun, 05-12-2016 a las 11:39 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Monday, December 5, 2016 11:28:17 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > On 12/05/2016 11:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I will adjust this on my end. Thanks for pointing that out :) But |
| 7 |
> > > ASSP did |
| 8 |
> > > its job, just I had my scoring to low. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Please let me know when you think you've fixed it, so I can prove |
| 11 |
> > otherwise =P |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Go ahead, spam me all you like. Others are welcome to the same. Its |
| 14 |
> why I run |
| 15 |
> ASSP for over a decade. I already lowered my scoring and showed you |
| 16 |
> why it |
| 17 |
> went through. You need to make sure your sending it as if you were |
| 18 |
> me. I need |
| 19 |
> to see the following. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> X-Assp-Envelope-From: wlt-ml@××××××.com |
| 22 |
> X-Assp-Intended-For: wlt-ml@××××××.com |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> However you sent it before, it was not from me as you seemed to |
| 25 |
> think. You can |
| 26 |
> see ASSP saw the headers, and to ASSP the from address was |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> X-Assp-Envelope-From: root@××××××××××××.com |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> You need to ensure your sending it as me to me. But even if you |
| 31 |
> repeat, I |
| 32 |
> lowered the threshold for scoring. It should be rejected now. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Can we please try to stop derailing the mail threads? What is this |
| 36 |
adding to the original topic of the thread? (if we are ever able to |
| 37 |
remember it after lots of unrelated messages on this and other threads) |
Archives