| 1 |
On 06/19/2016 05:35 PM, Amy Winston wrote: |
| 2 |
> Since the new policy causes headaches to bugzilla and spams users and |
| 3 |
> alias as well. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I would like to propose more simple way. What about we have just |
| 6 |
> maintainer bug for every maintainer and maintainers can comment their |
| 7 |
> request for maintaining packages there. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Any comments? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I generally prefer the current way, as any discussion on maintainership |
| 13 |
of a specific package, herunder tracking outstanding bugs that needs |
| 14 |
fixing etc will be atomic to the package maintaining bug. If we do |
| 15 |
everything in individual maintainer's bug we lose the possibility of |
| 16 |
using it as a semaphore for requests on packages as well. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Thanks |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Cheers, |
| 22 |
> Amy |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 32 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 33 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives