Gentoo Archives: gentoo-proxy-maint

From: NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o>
To: k_f@g.o, "Manuel Rüger" <mrueg@g.o>, "Göktürk Yüksek" <gokturk@g.o>, "proxy-maint@g.o" <proxy-maint@g.o>, gentoo-proxy-maint@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] Proxy Maintainers lead election: Call for nomination
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 21:04:24
Message-Id: 357B86C1-B2B8-4513-B1A1-DF0264C1C120@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] Proxy Maintainers lead election: Call for nomination by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On June 30, 2016 4:19:07 PM EDT, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote:
2 >On 06/30/2016 10:12 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
3 >> On 06/30/2016 04:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
4 >>> On 06/30/2016 10:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
5 >>>> On 06/30/2016 09:52 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
6 >>>>> On 06/30/2016 03:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
7 >>>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:39 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
8 >>>>>>> On 30.06.2016 02:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
9 >>>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 02:05 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
10 >>>>>>>>> Hi,
11 >>>>>>>>>
12 >
13 >
14 >>>
15 >> I have to go to a work meeting, so I'll read the summary later, ubt
16 >the
17 >> only two points that were agreed upon were that it should show the
18 >> election date and that the council should ask them to *consider*
19 >> electing a lead. Not force them to do so.
20 >>
21 >
22 >Thats a nice way of saying please do so :) The actual email that went
23 >out is
24 >https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/0ddae87c0b9c1fcc488063ea6b3370c5
25 >
26 >> he Council would like to encourage all projects to record who the
27 >leads
28 >> are and when the last election took place on the project pages of the
29 >
30 >> wiki. Having said that, the council understands that not all
31 >projects
32 >> strictly adhere to GLEP 39: they either operate without a lead or
33 >they
34 >> don't hold regular elections. If this is working for a project, then
35 >it
36 >
37 >which recognizes the GLEP requirement, however, there won't be any
38 >direct sanction for not having one in the general case.
39 >
40 >> is not our purpose to tell you to change your practice. However, if
41 >a
42 >> project does have a lead and elections are regularly held, please
43 >note
44 >> that on the project home page. We're hoping to track the leads so
45 >that
46 >> we have a point of contact for each project.
47 >
48 >Proxy maint is coordination point between multiple groups in the
49 >community and certainly should adhere to GLEP 39.
50 >
51 >--
52 >Kristian Fiskerstrand
53 >OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
54 >fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
55
56 This still reinforces that we don't NEED to have a lead. Gokturk's proposal for a "no lead" option is thus valid and must be honored. Since no one can "accept" that nomination, I second it, making it effective.
57 --
58 NP-Hardass