1 |
On June 30, 2016 4:19:07 PM EDT, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>On 06/30/2016 10:12 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: |
3 |
>> On 06/30/2016 04:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 06/30/2016 10:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:52 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> On 06/30/2016 03:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
7 |
>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:39 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>>> On 30.06.2016 02:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
9 |
>>>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 02:05 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote: |
10 |
>>>>>>>>> Hi, |
11 |
>>>>>>>>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> I have to go to a work meeting, so I'll read the summary later, ubt |
16 |
>the |
17 |
>> only two points that were agreed upon were that it should show the |
18 |
>> election date and that the council should ask them to *consider* |
19 |
>> electing a lead. Not force them to do so. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
> |
22 |
>Thats a nice way of saying please do so :) The actual email that went |
23 |
>out is |
24 |
>https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/0ddae87c0b9c1fcc488063ea6b3370c5 |
25 |
> |
26 |
>> he Council would like to encourage all projects to record who the |
27 |
>leads |
28 |
>> are and when the last election took place on the project pages of the |
29 |
> |
30 |
>> wiki. Having said that, the council understands that not all |
31 |
>projects |
32 |
>> strictly adhere to GLEP 39: they either operate without a lead or |
33 |
>they |
34 |
>> don't hold regular elections. If this is working for a project, then |
35 |
>it |
36 |
> |
37 |
>which recognizes the GLEP requirement, however, there won't be any |
38 |
>direct sanction for not having one in the general case. |
39 |
> |
40 |
>> is not our purpose to tell you to change your practice. However, if |
41 |
>a |
42 |
>> project does have a lead and elections are regularly held, please |
43 |
>note |
44 |
>> that on the project home page. We're hoping to track the leads so |
45 |
>that |
46 |
>> we have a point of contact for each project. |
47 |
> |
48 |
>Proxy maint is coordination point between multiple groups in the |
49 |
>community and certainly should adhere to GLEP 39. |
50 |
> |
51 |
>-- |
52 |
>Kristian Fiskerstrand |
53 |
>OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
54 |
>fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
55 |
|
56 |
This still reinforces that we don't NEED to have a lead. Gokturk's proposal for a "no lead" option is thus valid and must be honored. Since no one can "accept" that nomination, I second it, making it effective. |
57 |
-- |
58 |
NP-Hardass |