1 |
Am Samstag, 6. April 2019, 16:34:13 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
2 |
> Dnia April 6, 2019 11:35:35 AM UTC, Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> napisał(a): |
3 |
> >Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >I'd like to clean up the previous stable version of app-text/asciidoc, |
6 |
> >but it |
7 |
> >is still ~arm64 (which was not a stable arch at the time the stable bug |
8 |
> >[0] |
9 |
> >was opened). Should I re-open the bug and add ARM64, or open a new |
10 |
> >bug, or |
11 |
> >something else entirely? I think I've seen the first one be done |
12 |
> >before, but |
13 |
> >want to be sure. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Yes, please reopen it and add arm64. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> >Also, is there a canonical, up-to-date list of arch (stability) status? |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> >can't seem to find one outside of the list as presented in b.g.o (and |
22 |
> >also the |
23 |
> >downloads page on gentoo.org to some degree). I know there's GLEP-72, |
24 |
> >but I |
25 |
> >thought maybe there's something in the Wiki or Devmanual. (I think I |
26 |
> >asked |
27 |
> >this before, but can't find any reference or note, so sorry if I've |
28 |
> >already |
29 |
> >been given an answer.) |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I think the list presented on bugzilla is currently the canonical one. |
32 |
> Though for purposes of stabilizing packages that were stable already, just |
33 |
> cc all atches that had stable kw before (including exp arches). |
34 |
[...] |
35 |
|
36 |
Right, I'll reopen and add whatever arches are still missing that previously |
37 |
had stable versions. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Marc Joliet |
41 |
-- |
42 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
43 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |