Re: [gentoo-proxy-maint] Proxy Maintainers lead election: Call for nomination

[NP-Hardass]

On 06/30/2016 04:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 10:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 06/30/2016 09:52 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
>>> On 06/30/2016 03:43 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>> On 06/30/2016 09:39 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>>>> On 30.06.2016 02:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/30/2016 02:05 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>>>>>>>> This is a call for nominations to a member-initiated election
>>>>>>>> of a lead for the Proxy Maintainers project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose "no-lead" to be an option to run the project officially
>>>>>>> without a leader.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A lead is required for gentoo projects, so thats not an option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Just being curious, is there a GLEP that defines this?
>>>>
>>>> GLEP 39, " It may have one or many leads, and the leads are selected by
>>>> the members of the project. This selection must occur at least once
>>>> every 12 months, and may occur at any time."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> My interpretation of this statement is "may" means optional.  It doesn't
>>> say must have at least one lead.
>>>
>>
>> May refers to the choice of 1 or multiple
>>
>
> See also
> https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20150913-summary.txt
>
> 2. Projects without a lead, lead elections
> ==========================================
>
> The wording of GLEP 39 was found to be unclear if not confusing (it
> states that a project "may have one or many leads", and that their
> selection "must occur at least once every 12 months").
>
> After discussion the following points were agreed upon:
> * The Gentoo Wiki project page template should be enhanced to show the
>   last lead election date for each project.
> * The council sends an e-mail to the gentoo-project mailing list asking
>   projects to consider electing a lead and confirming her/him regularly.
>
>
>
>
I have to go to a work meeting, so I'll read the summary later, ubt the
only two points that were agreed upon were that it should show the
election date and that the council should ask them to *consider*
electing a lead.  Not force them to do so.

-- 
NP-Hardass