1 |
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> The idea is very simple: /etc/env.d/python/python[23] with a one-line |
4 |
>> value similar to the main interpreter /config file. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> That should be simpler & more reliable than reading a symlink. And at |
7 |
>> some point we can replace the symlink with an $EPYTHON-aware wrapper |
8 |
>> as well. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I don't understand the point of this. Do we have some need to enable |
11 |
> EPYTHON usages for scripts that have a python2 or python3 shebang? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I also don't understand how a text file is more reliable than a |
14 |
> symlink; they are basically the same thing, but the symlink has a |
15 |
> different file mode. |
16 |
|
17 |
Another reply that got lost due to wrong From: address. |