| 1 |
On 04/27/2012 12:35 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> 3. Added 61_all_process_data.patch, for which the goal seems somewhat unclear. |
| 3 |
>> This is some logic for python-wrapper that was in the 2.7.2 patchset as |
| 4 |
>> well. If you want to drop it, I'm sure that will require some |
| 5 |
>> re-engineering of python-wrapper. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Right. Do you know what this fixes, and how/why it will be |
| 8 |
> re-engineered? As long as we don't know these things, I'd prefer to |
| 9 |
> leave the patch out rather than include it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I have been bitten in the past by removing things that I don't fully |
| 13 |
understand, so I'm trying to avoid doing that. I guess I can drop it and |
| 14 |
see what happens. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>>> You also removed the mention of the upstream bug from |
| 17 |
>>> 04_all_libdir.patch, probably just by mistake? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> I don't see any mention of a bug in the 2.7.2, 2.7.3 or 2.7.3-0 version |
| 20 |
>> of the patch, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Are you sure? The 04* patch I just unpacked from my 2.7.3 patch set |
| 23 |
> does have a bug in it (maybe it wasn't in 2.7.2, though). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The words "bug" and "issue" do not appear in 04_all_libdir.patch from |
| 27 |
the copy of python-gentoo-patches-2.7.3.tar.bz2 that I just downloaded |
| 28 |
from distfiles.gentoo.org. I also checked the copy in distfiles-local on |
| 29 |
dev.gentoo.org. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I think you may be working with a different tarball, or I'm missing |
| 32 |
something really obvious. |
Archives