| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Patrick McLean <chutzpah@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Python-3.3.1 is now in the tree and passes all tests and none of the bugs in |
| 4 |
>> the Python 3.3 tracker (437322) appear to be blockers. I want add Python 3.3 |
| 5 |
>> to ~arch in 7 days (on May 6th). |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Does anyone have any objections to this? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I have none, but Mike G. should sign off on it before you go ahead, IMO. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As I indicated in IRC, it's ok by me. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Arfrever brought up a good point: we should adjust the default value |
| 15 |
of PYTHON_TARGETS as specified in the base profile. I think we will |
| 16 |
need to include both python3_2 and python3_3 until dev-lang/python-3.3 |
| 17 |
has been stabilized on relevant archs. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We will also need to stable-mask the python_targets_python3_3 and |
| 20 |
python_single_target_python3_3 use flags. |
Archives