1 |
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Is anyone in favor or opposed to this package rename idea? Are there any |
3 |
> better ideas? |
4 |
|
5 |
I've always thought renaming python-3 to python3 is faux-namespacing, |
6 |
and the thing SLOTs are supposed to help out with. Why aren't SLOTs |
7 |
helping us with this? |
8 |
|
9 |
The problem I have with it is that inevitably there's going to be a |
10 |
time we don't care about python-2 anymore, and we'll be stuck with the |
11 |
python3 package name (or have to go through annoying mechanics to |
12 |
rename it back). |
13 |
|
14 |
I agree that installing both is probably overkill for most users. I |
15 |
think the solution is somewhere outside the dev-lang/python package, |
16 |
though, in having the system set or portage or whatever the hell it is |
17 |
that first pulls in python prefer python-2. |
18 |
|
19 |
Cheers, |
20 |
|
21 |
Dirkjan |