| 1 |
Ah ha. Thanks for the link! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> Per http://kennethreitz.com/announcing-requests-v100.html, version |
| 5 |
> 1.0.0 defines the public API (he's saying they're doing SemVer). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> So I think we should keep things as is for now, maybe just make sure |
| 8 |
> the rdeps either (a) work with 1.x or (b) restrict them from 1.x. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Cheers, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Dirkjan |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
>> requests seems to break its api frequently, which sucks for having it |
| 16 |
>> installed system-wide. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> The few packages that depend on it have < or = deps in the tree. This |
| 19 |
>> sucks because it could cause dependency conflicts. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> * These packages depend on requests: |
| 22 |
>> dev-python/python-keystoneclient-0.2.1 (dev-python/requests) |
| 23 |
>> dev-python/python-keystoneclient-9999 (dev-python/requests) |
| 24 |
>> dev-python/python-novaclient-2.10.0 (test ? dev-python/requests) |
| 25 |
>> dev-python/python-novaclient-9999 (test ? dev-python/requests) |
| 26 |
>> dev-python/sphinxcontrib-issuetracker-0.10.1 (>=dev-python/requests-0.13) |
| 27 |
>> net-misc/flexget-1.0_beta3181 (=dev-python/requests-0.14*) |
| 28 |
>> net-misc/flexget-9999 (=dev-python/requests-0.14*) |
| 29 |
>> net-misc/httpie-0.3.0 (>=dev-python/requests-0.10.1) |
| 30 |
>> net-misc/httpie-0.3.0-r1 (>=dev-python/requests-0.10.1) |
| 31 |
>> (<dev-python/requests-1.0) |
| 32 |
>> net-misc/httpie-0.3.1 (>=dev-python/requests-0.10.1) |
| 33 |
>> (<dev-python/requests-1.0) |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> I follow flexget somewhat closely, and their upstream is probably in no |
| 36 |
>> hurry to port it to the new api. They suggest using a virtualenv instead |
| 37 |
>> of installing it system-wide. |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> The QA team would probably tell us to mask requests-1.0* or the reverse |
| 40 |
>> dependencies. Any preference here? |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> Does anyone have any better ideas? |
| 43 |
>> |
Archives