1 |
Dnia 2013-09-14, o godz. 19:33:04 |
2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Dnia 2013-09-14, o godz. 18:16:33 |
6 |
> > Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> napisał(a): |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> >> > The sub-roots are no longer necessary since we're installing scripts to |
10 |
> >> > per-impl directories initially. |
11 |
> >> > --- |
12 |
> >> > gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 9 +++------ |
13 |
> >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) |
14 |
> >> > |
15 |
> >> > diff --git a/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass |
16 |
> >> > index 7102c58..5fcb55e 100644 |
17 |
> >> > --- a/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass |
18 |
> >> > +++ b/gx86/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass |
19 |
> >> > @@ -476,9 +476,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_install() { |
20 |
> >> > addpredict "$(python_get_sitedir)" |
21 |
> >> > addpredict /usr/lib/portage/pym |
22 |
> >> > |
23 |
> >> > - local root=${D}/_${EPYTHON} |
24 |
> >> > - [[ ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]] && root=${D} |
25 |
> >> > - flags+=( --root="${root}" ) |
26 |
> >> > + flags+=( --root="${D}" ) |
27 |
> >> > |
28 |
> >> > if [[ ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then |
29 |
> >> > local PYTHON_SCRIPTDIR |
30 |
> >> > @@ -488,13 +486,12 @@ distutils-r1_python_install() { |
31 |
> >> > |
32 |
> >> > esetup.py install "${flags[@]}" "${@}" |
33 |
> >> > |
34 |
> >> > - if [[ -d ${root}$(python_get_sitedir)/tests ]]; then |
35 |
> >> > + if [[ -d ${D}$(python_get_sitedir)/tests ]]; then |
36 |
> >> > die "Package installs 'tests' package, file collisions likely." |
37 |
> >> > fi |
38 |
> >> > |
39 |
> >> > if [[ ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then |
40 |
> >> > - _distutils-r1_wrap_scripts "${root}" |
41 |
> >> > - multibuild_merge_root "${root}" "${D}" |
42 |
> >> > + _distutils-r1_wrap_scripts "${D}" |
43 |
> >> > fi |
44 |
> >> > } |
45 |
> >> > |
46 |
> >> > -- |
47 |
> >> > 1.8.3.2 |
48 |
> >> > |
49 |
> >> |
50 |
> >> I believe this patch causes a race condition which causes |
51 |
> >> java-config's ebuild to fail. |
52 |
> >> |
53 |
> >> running install_data |
54 |
> >> running install_egg_info |
55 |
> >> Writing /tmp/portage/dev-java/java-config-2.2.0/image/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/java_config- |
56 |
> >> 2.2.0-py2.7.egg-info |
57 |
> >> error: /tmp/portage/dev-java/java-config-2.2.0/image//usr/share/java-config-2/config/: |
58 |
> >> File exists |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > I love when people hack build systems and have no idea about writing |
61 |
> > build systems... |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > What are you suggesting? Finding all the broken stuff and fixing it, or |
64 |
> > restoring sub-roots? |
65 |
> |
66 |
> This is a well-used package which will be broken if we apply this |
67 |
> patch. I'm not sure we can reliably identify this kind of problem, and |
68 |
> fixing individual packages would be a bit of work in any case.. |
69 |
> Keeping the sub-roots code in place seems like the safer course of |
70 |
> action here. |
71 |
|
72 |
You're right. Replaced 5-8 with two smaller patches and submitted |
73 |
in a new sub-thread here. You can also find it in -r4 branch. |
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
Best regards, |
77 |
Michał Górny |