1 |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 21:38, Sjujsckij Nikolaj <sterkrig@×××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> But when Linux 3.x goes stable, stable Python versions suddenly became |
3 |
> "broken". |
4 |
|
5 |
Well, only versions of Python built *after* you start using the new kernel. |
6 |
|
7 |
> I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree |
8 |
> keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and know for |
9 |
> sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to recompile it and |
10 |
> boom! half of Python modules stop working. I daresay these cases should be |
11 |
> handled too. |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we |
14 |
should probably revbump the others, too. |
15 |
|
16 |
Cheers, |
17 |
|
18 |
Dirkjan |