From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-python <gentoo-python@l.g.o>, Gentoo Python Project <python@g.o>, dolsen@g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-python] Re: Minimal technical demo for alternate bindir scheme | ||
Date: | Sat, 07 Sep 2013 20:12:01 | ||
Message-Id: | CAJ0EP43+jXfvQd5O0XEq_cc1fANAP=9ppXTQG9y4L3khM-t4uw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-python] Minimal technical demo for alternate bindir scheme by "Michał Górny" |
1 | On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > Expect new levels of screwup. Things that definitely don't work: |
3 | > |
4 | > 2. things that rely on /usr/bin path. We will need new wrappers for |
5 | > that. If we really want that. |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | I wonder what to do about python-based daemons with systemd units. The |
9 | unit file format requires that ExecStart be a fully qualified path. |