Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Matthew Summers <quantumsummers@g.o>
To: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-python@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Am I wrong about mod_python?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:16:46
Message-Id: CAET+hMRAGE3T4y5RbZoqVD6q_2+9OGU6p7W+ni1=5tj659qBrw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Am I wrong about mod_python? by Mike Gilbert
1 On Jan 3, 2013 4:10 PM, "Mike Gilbert" <floppym@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On 1/3/2013 4:36 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
4 > > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343663.
5 > >
6 > > Do you agree, or am I being stubborn?
7 > >
8 > > Perhaps it would be better to restrict the tests for now and just keep
9 > > it around, as Alexander proposes in comment 12?
10 > >
11 > > Cheers,
12 > >
13 > > Dirkjan
14 > >
15 >
16 > If nobody cared, I would agree with treecleaning it. However, that does
17 > not appear to be the case.
18 >
19 > If people are able to use it in production as-is, let's just leave it
20 alone.
21 >
22
23 Restrict tests and keep it. Its dead upstream but there are still users.
24 Further, it does not present any sec issues. Keep users happy as long as
25 the pain to maintain is not too great.