1 |
On Jan 3, 2013 4:10 PM, "Mike Gilbert" <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 1/3/2013 4:36 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
4 |
> > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343663. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Do you agree, or am I being stubborn? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Perhaps it would be better to restrict the tests for now and just keep |
9 |
> > it around, as Alexander proposes in comment 12? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Cheers, |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Dirkjan |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> If nobody cared, I would agree with treecleaning it. However, that does |
17 |
> not appear to be the case. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> If people are able to use it in production as-is, let's just leave it |
20 |
alone. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Restrict tests and keep it. Its dead upstream but there are still users. |
24 |
Further, it does not present any sec issues. Keep users happy as long as |
25 |
the pain to maintain is not too great. |