From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKlfO-0007ta-Hn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:53:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k860rF0v019692; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:53:15 GMT Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k860rFIp015036 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:53:15 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.145] (helo=anti-virus03-08) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKlfG-0007pQ-Vg for gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:53:15 +0100 Received: from [82.46.45.60] (helo=gaspode) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKlfG-0007lm-HS for gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:53:14 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) From: Christel Dahlskjaer To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode> References: <44FB824F.9020308@gentoo.org> <20060905235047.TAb1651.tv@veller.net> <44FDF674.9020302@gentoo.org> <20060906002043.TA8e549.tv@veller.net> <44FE0AA7.1090906@gentoo.org> <1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:52:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fb6158dd-49a9-428e-a1b3-73440adec5de X-Archives-Hash: a06c63814f829cfbd733de05b83ed3e1 On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; > > where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the > > lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. > > God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd > > get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at > > finding me magically added. Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me under the guise of following procedure? If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this puerile (something)ery. -- gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list