From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKm1E-0001DI-J8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:15:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k861FXnu014471; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:15:33 GMT Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k861FWYO027105 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:15:32 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.140] (helo=anti-virus02-07) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKm0q-0004ed-H4 for gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:15:32 +0100 Received: from [82.46.45.60] (helo=gaspode) by asmtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GKm0q-0003P7-2Q for gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:15:32 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) From: Christel Dahlskjaer To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44FE1F87.6080704@gentoo.org> References: <44FB824F.9020308@gentoo.org> <20060905235047.TAb1651.tv@veller.net> <44FDF674.9020302@gentoo.org> <20060906002043.TA8e549.tv@veller.net> <44FE0AA7.1090906@gentoo.org> <1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode> <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> <44FE1F87.6080704@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:15:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1157508900.6424.216.camel@gaspode> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: db8ee5d2-ddf6-4906-9dd0-de487b216bf4 X-Archives-Hash: d3d7697c81651ec5838abe5b6ceeff78 On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:08 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > > >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; > >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the > >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. > >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd > >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at > >>> finding me magically added. > > > > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it > > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me > > under the guise of following procedure? > > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to > > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this > > puerile (something)ery. > > > > > > I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing > X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end > up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place. That I suspect is very true, and I agree. I'm sure it was on his TODO list. :) -- gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list