From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OrXoy-000555-0d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:04:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 404DAE0764 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C5EE0700 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so2018852wyf.40 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.188.197 with SMTP id a47mr758092wen.70.1283525842610; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.28.8.1] (host249-252-static.95-94-b.business.telecomitalia.it [94.95.252.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p42sm1272066weq.12.2010.09.03.07.57.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= Subject: [gentoo-qa] Reiterating my vote of no confidence on Mark Loeser as QA lead From: Diego Elio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eA9aB+m/lbYl7c1BwKLq" Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1283525847.8231.31.camel@yamato.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-Archives-Salt: 46d03156-cdb0-41ce-a9d3-14166f6e38ec X-Archives-Hash: 3ab8ebea1b50fb0d2ed68fa74a3fc60f --=-eA9aB+m/lbYl7c1BwKLq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Given that - Mike Frysinger already insisted on me not to discussing these things in the privacy of the qa@gentoo.org alias no matter the situation; - I cannot make public the whole context of the situation, given that is being currently discussed on private aliases; - I feel it is important for me to point out _right away_ about this I'm going to express once again my vote of no confidence. Mark has been expressing his will to lead QA, but seems to be failing at basic leading tasks such as making sure that the team actually exists (how many people actually responded to my roll call, compared to what actually the project enlists?). In particular, he failed to even notify the rest of the team about important developments in a QA-critical devrel case, the resolution of which, from the current outlook, will cause further workload on the (already strained) QA team. I don't care who else is proposing to lead QA, but I don't think Mark is the right person for the job at this point in time. --=20 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ --=-eA9aB+m/lbYl7c1BwKLq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJMgQzUAAoJEBqCrVe7WSRDuK0H/3pNjOpX5Cng32qBzBdRNii9 K8R5jssF98/iIiGjaRJERDa+gTQMOCRBhNH8qNCMBG1H6dhA1SBS90bhRX76cQUn JCpSYED0ImGMraQA0Mp+uBKmqYA7qi1RxvEdu0ChZdIeAFQNyxA9LKGCoBKfYe1I qYAVq1SlT46JUmZCCm9zeCKKIBPde6dKOpbxNi8LqJlYtSBJWDhDvuQ9jvGK7ddM ymWwiT7D4qkyMGCBTyfkyckMCEdPcTYcsOETVuHcXP9I1l1qDka6tQmcEP53Sm66 GG+IK4644vhjWIN/iBedLqRjLIIBS2RuoDcaSH4HcAxBeDkM9ge1pyZdKQjITS0= =ULGo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eA9aB+m/lbYl7c1BwKLq--