From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OrYkc-00037q-3u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:04:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D9CE08A2 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987AFE071E for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2199059wwf.10 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.72.213 with SMTP id n21mr270450wbj.66.1283527240413; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.28.8.1] (host249-252-static.95-94-b.business.telecomitalia.it [94.95.252.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i14sm1636766wbe.18.2010.09.03.08.20.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Diego_Elio_Petten=C3=B2?= Subject: [gentoo-qa] Re: Reiterating my vote of no confidence on Mark Loeser as QA lead From: Diego Elio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1283525847.8231.31.camel@yamato.local> References: <1283525847.8231.31.camel@yamato.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cNI9WppkEmUhMnrk6mRu" Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:20:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1283527245.8231.51.camel@yamato.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 X-Archives-Salt: 9821251a-c55e-41ca-9a04-35f4ceea01df X-Archives-Hash: 0cde9ff6353adafaa03a055333e3d15d --=-cNI9WppkEmUhMnrk6mRu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 16.57 +0200, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 ha scritto: > In particular, he failed to even notify the rest of > the team about important developments in a QA-critical devrel case, > the > resolution of which, from the current outlook, will cause further > workload on the (already strained) QA team.=20 Actually, at the current point in time (with developments that once again cannot be made public =E2=80=94 thus why I would have preferred for t= his discussion not to be in public right away, but alas), I'll have to retire my objection here. I'd still like to see for a different action for what concerns QA though, and also more involvement from the rest of the team members. --=20 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 =E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ --=-cNI9WppkEmUhMnrk6mRu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJMgRJKAAoJEBqCrVe7WSRD1wUH/1eBMtp2ipUh/+QqhPSmvn2f UmOWyBYJWYOvoi7+4+gApq0KKpyKZJBxWx52CMJ3GgzmTSE1TMEyZ+JLoR3ec2iu umsQJXoftIIWft/RFcbW1slpjHt58r7OsijPbqRmiXPwzzV+FT8pGRXkjG+/64bb MFStqqQlM9+DQkZ50wL9YvafzGhhX7wPBsBnpWI9XxuZO/DKkOqpB+nNARYqXRO4 y/pdYPLfUw+bgp9kuuHok5LrIY76hlhrLtrSuRp3eNN2mWeFVlI2fiPbMqD+MeLD HiALRLCDjarscetWFJYFFv4AdMYWhpBlFgYW+czKRwqaSkWNT+iPC4j0ENsf640= =G3gQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cNI9WppkEmUhMnrk6mRu--