From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FD9JS-0004dz-SN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:58:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1PNwWFX021543; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:58:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1PNwTla023634 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:58:32 GMT Received: from [65.98.89.194] (helo=aerie.halcy0n.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FD9Iz-0007om-EZ for gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA047E9F9 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from aerie.halcy0n.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (halcy0n.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25141-02-2 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:58:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF6117E9FA; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:58:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:58:27 -0500 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-qa] Live CVS ebuilds in the tree Message-ID: <20060225235827.GC15211@aerie.halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OBd5C1Lgu00Gd/Tn" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at halcy0n.com X-Archives-Salt: 47f59d1a-4a41-4404-bcca-6b576231ac68 X-Archives-Hash: 39d5149790216cd53eb63b91f20b1c72 --OBd5C1Lgu00Gd/Tn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, I am wondering how everyone feels about live CVS ebuilds in the tree. I'd prefer that everyone did CVS snapshots, but I know that won't happen overnight. The real problem that I have is live CVS ebuilds that are not in package.mask. The handbook seems to encourage marking them ~arch and not place them in package.mask, so I am curious how others feel about it before bringing this up on gentoo-dev@. Thanks, --=20 Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ http://www.halcy0n.com --OBd5C1Lgu00Gd/Tn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAO8jCRZPokWLroQRAh+/AKCdRUFBIOKG+bq3gUmjyP9iLONQvgCfalps iMdCpG0dJN0GfPaUbZ4fC1o= =XYpq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OBd5C1Lgu00Gd/Tn-- -- gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list