From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaLXy-0000fB-Pw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:50:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53EC3E06F9; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aerie.halcy0n.com (aerie.halcy0n.com [65.98.89.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0C6E06F9 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1A37DE9A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:50:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at halcy0n.com Received: from aerie.halcy0n.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (halcy0n.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id US2utZCJGxIh for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 393D67DEA8; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:50:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:50:44 -0400 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] splitting up package.mask Message-ID: <20080315015044.GJ25709@aerie.halcy0n.com> References: <47D9EA1D.5070602@gentoo.org> <20080314081242.d3633131.genone@gentoo.org> <1205528082.6726.2.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="boAH8PqvUi1v1f55" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1205528082.6726.2.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 40c313b1-a5fe-48c7-9870-b7a0a793e95a X-Archives-Hash: 9148c5fb927a904321d7ec948011066a --boAH8PqvUi1v1f55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni said: > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 08:12 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > so depends if you want to risk breaking them. >=20 > s/want to risk/care about/ >=20 > Remember, PMS isn't approved, so all we "care about" is portage. ;] Well, PMS being approved is the direction we are going, so it would be nice for us to inform the other PM maintainers what we plan on doing so they know they should have support. > I think this seems like a good idea. I'd prefer that if we do make this > change, that it waits until *after* 2008.0 is released, so I don't need > to sync up all these changes from the tree. Sounds good to me. Is it still looking like we are on schedule for that release to go out? Thanks, --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --boAH8PqvUi1v1f55 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2yt0CRZPokWLroQRAqapAKC06czaI8xFL/YkqW+lZVF/gR4wswCgqjaK Aod3VNB1S2UwlLnK9LiAN3E= =ELRj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --boAH8PqvUi1v1f55-- -- gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org mailing list