From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OmtNZ-0005Md-Lr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:05:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC2FE07CB for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rookery.halcy0n.com (rookery.halcy0n.com [69.72.242.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86E8E07BC for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rookery.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6166A5620; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:11:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:11:42 -0400 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] Message-ID: <20100821181142.GA32624@halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Archives-Salt: eaeff39b-3b01-44a0-9c41-ac6d81ae55a2 X-Archives-Hash: 98f18a682ac8dd55b9943ced59974212 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Splitting this since Piotr brought up something I wanted to. Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski said: > On 21 August 2010 19:46, Diego Elio =E2=80=9CFlameeyes=E2=80=9D wrote: > > The role of the lead in this project cannot be simply a "supervising" > > one, given that it's the only member of the team that devrel is > > interested in hearing from (situation that, by itself, should probably > > be changed); it requires actual leading and decision-taking, especially > > given the current situation where many policies have never been written > > down, and our documentation resources for developers are scattered and > > outdated. >=20 > I agree that this should probably be changed. I somehow recall 2 QA > members being able to make decisions on behalf of QA if quick action > is necessary. This was brought up in a recent council meeting as well. I just haven't had a chance to write up an email to the list since I've been on vacation. 2 ideas were presented: 1) Have someone else that those powers can be delegated to (a co-lead or something) 2) If 2 QA members rule for suspension of access, then it is done. #2 seems to alleviate any bottlenecks that could happen. What does everyone else think? This can wait until after whatever is decided with the election, but the conversation should take place regardless. --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMcBbeCRZPokWLroQRAntwAJ9xX/R/YyGzPbbvP3F1pREyhTu0XACcCt7R C7ExrhuC6T9xNPUzOSO5sQQ= =ytbu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--