From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKliq-0004R0-QR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:56:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k860unLD009800; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:56:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k860umBT020418 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:56:48 GMT Received: from [10.99.0.1] (adsl-71-158-135-138.dsl.renocs.sbcglobal.net [71.158.135.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3297646BF for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44FE1CC6.8090407@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:56:38 -0700 From: Joshua Jackson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060804) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) References: <44FB824F.9020308@gentoo.org> <20060905235047.TAb1651.tv@veller.net> <44FDF674.9020302@gentoo.org> <20060906002043.TA8e549.tv@veller.net> <44FE0AA7.1090906@gentoo.org> <1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode> <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> In-Reply-To: <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 99afef0f-cb3e-43a9-b4c5-8231dc367b17 X-Archives-Hash: 06d3ebaba260061c37acdecfc4ff28f3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at >>> finding me magically added. > > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me > under the guise of following procedure? > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this > puerile (something)ery. > > I'm glad we're social and understanding on qa as well..wonderful to see the comradely that we have in the rank and file. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE/hzGSENan+PfizARApGBAJwOdmfYUSh1oR6RXV2iI4wnFCA4KgCfba5E Jh5mTgZ1rh8S90zK4hi7bn8= =zGR+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list