From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKlt3-0005uJ-RJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:07:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8617M4h032156; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:07:22 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8617LKt011911 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:07:21 GMT Received: from [35.11.210.66] (warnera6.user.msu.edu [35.11.210.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8617L6X016418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:07:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44FE1F87.6080704@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:08:23 -0400 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060612) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) References: <44FB824F.9020308@gentoo.org> <20060905235047.TAb1651.tv@veller.net> <44FDF674.9020302@gentoo.org> <20060906002043.TA8e549.tv@veller.net> <44FE0AA7.1090906@gentoo.org> <1157507158.6424.212.camel@gaspode> <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> In-Reply-To: <1157507562.6424.214.camel@gaspode> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=51C1BC98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ae9c380c-724f-4154-a440-20d71f32f574 X-Archives-Hash: 6442167c8c2b90dd1f015fbfbffa518e Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at >>> finding me magically added. > > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me > under the guise of following procedure? > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this > puerile (something)ery. > > I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place. -- gentoo-qa@gentoo.org mailing list