From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH0Nr-00079d-Kr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94E7EE05D6; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227C6E05D6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id fnun1Y0080x6nqcAA0RM00; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([76.23.44.115]) by OMTA12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ftQU1Y00b2V5hVo8Y00000; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:29 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=-22vX-DGCUHJeIWMMHMA:9 a=baMaBmx2GyD38Vqw3tkA:7 a=EYyN6OQ4vtu8FBbIycPMhpBgOxUA:4 a=WeOa-AV5lc8A:10 a=vNGxQsTWjH8A:10 Message-ID: <4794D54A.7020301@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:24:26 -0700 From: Steve Dibb User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071118) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] qa lead election References: <200801170136.15241.vapier@gentoo.org> <200801171340.03851.peper@gentoo.org> <20080117162649.GM10389@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20080121154858.GA30251@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121154858.GA30251@aerie.halcy0n.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5455545b-95d7-4fe9-afce-cc703bb8f404 X-Archives-Hash: 57cf6c99e3a271f946d45d03baf3f2bf Mark Loeser wrote: > Mark Loeser said: >> So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's what >> I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on our feet: >> >> * Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned to us, >> or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all are >> difficult, but require a few people doing some work. >> * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing list, >> and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team meets >> criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. >> * Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our >> biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and >> find out which are even solvable. >> >> That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things we >> can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our focus to >> start with. > > So, its been several days now. Is anyone else interested in the QA lead > position besides myself? How do my plans above sound? I say go for it. As for #3, I've always been interested in quantifying QA issues, and I'll be interested in any ideas you come up with, and might be able to help out some. Steve -- gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org mailing list