From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OrdQw-0002Ij-7H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:04:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD1C1E0812 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2A4E080C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.198] (qiv6.kyla.fi [82.130.46.198]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF2DE397DB for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C815764.2040102@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:15:32 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] References: <20100821181142.GA32624@halcy0n.com> <1282420055.445.54.camel@yamato.local> <20100903151252.GE21473@halcy0n.com> <4C8125BB.6050408@gentoo.org> <1283540790.2293.51.camel@saladin.local> In-Reply-To: <1283540790.2293.51.camel@saladin.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF61D2C970ED228D2974ACA73" X-Archives-Salt: 8eb59b9a-b197-407f-8193-44d60013c6e9 X-Archives-Hash: 65257d2ee88ad623296bada80b5af1b4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF61D2C970ED228D2974ACA73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty ha scritt= o: >> >> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down >> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think >> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access >> are not available fast enough. >=20 > If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done withou= t > DevRel intervention at first. >=20 > Right now we have something along these lines: >=20 > QA team member finds the screwup =E2=86=92 reports to QA lead =E2=86=92= ask nicely the > devrel read =E2=86=92 devrel can sit thinking about it. >=20 I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have less people involved. Regards, Petteri --------------enigF61D2C970ED228D2974ACA73 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMgVdkAAoJEPeUsk245OzwXRoP/0F1ZaZRl4Wp6ZpbR0z5nfQd CiiQP/TWD9ZwJZ7mAyOYI8wMFdmfne/wp3okR5o0OxIvni04ZBFY7qn0eutaetuy 3r5qS38y7GM9g1LqUr22FYfPWKgCkvpBo8+DuGPvt8HeswiAwcKecVxi5SfaehQB DhtpHRxfO7olDijfNwASJj8tiNYhxrm2jblodYyyzkej9Syoiw/EoIv2cufHFxK+ oEgVzdrPG3g1qZ9eB2Yl2DQLpfgvSnv84KJJj0y2I9SC4b4nRQz6Sfch5hd8W46Q 4fvthA4gauAPSgXN8flY4GlYHUOnn0AgHphXt6wYZnJa3v8XYI3os0CtecjgdAt1 3a5BODHFQZCLBKR+B9GjrNMdFeC4VErhGi8cnDHf8przQpWFQbAYZJ1RcKQTNaPr VpEcbY8CJOiAU/QHtQP0JTqqJHejVKGjy4DIA4syyTjQ0G2dHWFARx1U6qAhNgQx u1ZssvQC7Qu1LBTiXk0yOLmW7f3O3KKl7O6/jAvaJUeveeA5utL8XfvDHZlOfhkl UCBqtL2SxshpnE1+300Od835zHfs8g32cQ7K3yIfTnXHllp03h9089XvsSMP9byP qhUY9F+QSW26lEuvB5kyg6mHVXhAWC/7kCHqve9DsCEREeGTrh40YkLCVlt2C1I+ +UoyOaVqItU7UNEkr0Xa =wvN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF61D2C970ED228D2974ACA73--