Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: "Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:07:27
Message-Id: 1282420055.445.54.camel@yamato.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-qa] QA power to suspend access [WAS: Re: Roll-call for the team members and requesting a new election] by Mark Loeser
1 Il giorno sab, 21/08/2010 alle 14.11 -0400, Mark Loeser ha scritto:
2 >
3 > #2 seems to alleviate any bottlenecks that could happen. What does
4 > everyone else think? This can wait until after whatever is decided
5 > with
6 > the election, but the conversation should take place regardless.
7
8 I agree that #2 sounds the best.
9
10 In case we all agree on that, should we ask devrel nicely to write that
11 down on their own policy or do we have to pass through council?
12
13 --
14 Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
15 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
16
17 If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
18 it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/

Replies