1 |
First off, checking the current list of QA members, please answer just |
2 |
to make sure you are active and still interested of being part of the |
3 |
team: |
4 |
|
5 |
- Mark Loeser |
6 |
- Diego Elio Pettenò (here); |
7 |
- Markos Chandras |
8 |
- Christian Ruppert |
9 |
- Piotr Jaroszyński |
10 |
- Tomas Chvatal |
11 |
- Ned Ludd (not on qa@g.o alias) |
12 |
- Sven Wegener |
13 |
- Torsten Veller |
14 |
- Joshua Jackson (not on qa@g.o alias) |
15 |
- Mike Frysinger |
16 |
- Samuli Suominen (not on project page) |
17 |
- Brian Ferring (not on project page) |
18 |
|
19 |
After this I'd like to call for an election of a new lead; I have asked |
20 |
privately for Mark to resign, or call up new elections himself, so that |
21 |
I could avoid to state it this way but I see no other choice. |
22 |
|
23 |
Given the current (sorry) state of QA, working mostly leadless (Mark |
24 |
seems to be around when you're complaining he's not around), and with |
25 |
most members apathetic about all kind of issues, I'm proposing myself as |
26 |
new lead. |
27 |
|
28 |
The role of the lead in this project cannot be simply a "supervising" |
29 |
one, given that it's the only member of the team that devrel is |
30 |
interested in hearing from (situation that, by itself, should probably |
31 |
be changed); it requires actual leading and decision-taking, especially |
32 |
given the current situation where many policies have never been written |
33 |
down, and our documentation resources for developers are scattered and |
34 |
outdated. |
35 |
|
36 |
Given that I for one feel like the lead should be an active presence in |
37 |
the project, together with my offer to step up I promise that if I ever |
38 |
were to find myself in a situation where I wouldn't be able to find the |
39 |
time to keep up with my duties, I'd be resigning and asking for new |
40 |
elections right away. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
44 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
45 |
|
46 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
47 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |