1 |
Given that |
2 |
|
3 |
- Mike Frysinger already insisted on me not to discussing these things |
4 |
in the privacy of the qa@g.o alias no matter the situation; |
5 |
- I cannot make public the whole context of the situation, given that |
6 |
is being currently discussed on private aliases; |
7 |
- I feel it is important for me to point out _right away_ about this |
8 |
|
9 |
I'm going to express once again my vote of no confidence. Mark has been |
10 |
expressing his will to lead QA, but seems to be failing at basic leading |
11 |
tasks such as making sure that the team actually exists (how many people |
12 |
actually responded to my roll call, compared to what actually the |
13 |
project enlists?). In particular, he failed to even notify the rest of |
14 |
the team about important developments in a QA-critical devrel case, the |
15 |
resolution of which, from the current outlook, will cause further |
16 |
workload on the (already strained) QA team. |
17 |
|
18 |
I don't care who else is proposing to lead QA, but I don't think Mark is |
19 |
the right person for the job at this point in time. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
23 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
24 |
|
25 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
26 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |