| 1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
>> So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's what |
| 4 |
>> I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on our feet: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> * Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned to us, |
| 7 |
>> or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all are |
| 8 |
>> difficult, but require a few people doing some work. |
| 9 |
>> * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing list, |
| 10 |
>> and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team meets |
| 11 |
>> criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. |
| 12 |
>> * Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our |
| 13 |
>> biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and |
| 14 |
>> find out which are even solvable. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things we |
| 17 |
>> can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our focus to |
| 18 |
>> start with. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> So, its been several days now. Is anyone else interested in the QA lead |
| 21 |
> position besides myself? How do my plans above sound? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I say go for it. As for #3, I've always been interested in quantifying |
| 25 |
QA issues, and I'll be interested in any ideas you come up with, and |
| 26 |
might be able to help out some. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Steve |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-qa@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives