Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] qa lead election
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:27:02
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] qa lead election by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@g.o> said:
> On Thursday 17 of January 2008 07:36:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so it's been long enough to hold another qa lead election. who wants to > > run ? i (and i imagine many others) nominate Mark. if no one else gets > > nominated, it'll streamline the election process ;) ... > > I still want to see his resurrection plan though :] > > Imho having a meeting @ #gentoo-qa once a month or so would help us becoming a > team and not just a bunch of devs at qa alias. We could discuss the QA > problems, set goals etc. Also, the slacker marks system used in council would > quickly show who wants to be in the team and who doesn't.
So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's what I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on our feet: * Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned to us, or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all are difficult, but require a few people doing some work. * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing list, and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team meets criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. * Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and find out which are even solvable. That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things we can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our focus to start with. -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web -


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] qa lead election Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>