1 |
On 09/03/2010 10:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> Il giorno ven, 03/09/2010 alle 19.43 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> It doesn't require infra as DevRel has the needed powers to shut down |
5 |
>> access. DevRel is needed any way to process the retirement. I think |
6 |
>> infra should only be the fallback if DevRel people with needed access |
7 |
>> are not available fast enough. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> If you couldn't notice, we're explicitly trying to get this done without |
10 |
> DevRel intervention at first. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Right now we have something along these lines: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> QA team member finds the screwup → reports to QA lead → ask nicely the |
15 |
> devrel read → devrel can sit thinking about it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I didn't propose allowing DevRel to refuse. I find it simpler to have |
19 |
less people involved. |
20 |
|
21 |
Regards, |
22 |
Petteri |