1 |
On 05/23/11 12:22, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> On 21/05/2011 02:03 ¼¼, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
>> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: |
4 |
>>> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't |
5 |
>>> control |
6 |
>>> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and |
7 |
>>> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members |
10 |
>> not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> 5 days and still no responses. May we should reconsider whether QA is |
15 |
> actually a "team" or just 4-5 individual members acting on their own? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Regards, |
18 |
|
19 |
I am following this issue and the bugs with Samuli and Arfrever etc. I |
20 |
just don't have anything to say. If we feel elections are necessary, I |
21 |
will participate. I think I am up to speed on all of what's been going |
22 |
on enough to voice my opinion intelligently. |
23 |
|
24 |
As to whether or not we need elections early, I don't think we do. I |
25 |
personally consider this entire issue to be a giant pile of nonsense. We |
26 |
are arguing over ChangeLogs. I can think of so many more important |
27 |
important issues than that to find solutions to. We also can easily |
28 |
automate ChangeLog generation etc as long as we want to log everything, |
29 |
in which case this entire fiasco would be moot. (There are also other |
30 |
solutions to this set of problems we could consider.) However, at the |
31 |
moment, the only thing I see is a pissing match over the current policy. |
32 |
Both sides have technical merits. However, we are creating a very public |
33 |
scene with all of this, and that is something I down right do not |
34 |
approve of. When we want to get back to the technical issue itself, I |
35 |
will gladly voice my opinion. |
36 |
|
37 |
I like to think that QA is a decent team of people. I've worked with |
38 |
most people on the team in the past couple months. Having said that, I |
39 |
don't think spending an hour or so every month or two making sure |
40 |
everyone is on the same page would be a bad idea. I also don't think |
41 |
formalizing some of the procedures etc would be a bad idea. There was |
42 |
one idea I thought was interesting on bug |
43 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 comment 51. None the |
44 |
less, that is all a topic for a separate thread. |
45 |
|
46 |
Regards, |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
50 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
51 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |