Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:23:08
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
Hash: SHA512

On 21/05/2011 02:03 μμ, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 21/05/2011 alle 12.26 +0300, Samuli Suominen ha scritto: >> In light of recent events, our current lead has proofen he can't >> control >> himself in civil manner. It's not a behavior lead should have and >> tarnishes the reputation for whole team. > > Let it be on record that the reputation has been tarnished by QA members > not following the very policy they are supposed to enforce. > > But fine by me, I candiate me and scarabeus. >
5 days and still no responses. May we should reconsider whether QA is actually a "team" or just 4-5 individual members acting on their own? Regards, - -- Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJN2onPAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCctQQALguDYk1++dwQ4KQTjKfJNLd LMeCN5/gLql9ON2eB8ZuZkg3sgh4zEEeU6q5Yy+n+nJOK5d7AowKQvmZ4J0svk8p FVbSCaGPhnGshPxXHRU+RQgJachC7ygGZjKVUoVgBLipDphZ2tYlgnicqMvRa8Wp fPnblhdogDGg1XbozFAcj73BVgoYRRuyYyxhafsFNL/045XrCwM1pI03dgw8Z0bs 0cFNBMgvuYK7BjWPIy7ObKPmixPOw7HdOmA4Z+5uhBJxt1qpyWDAb5i6VO07iAkj iOegAeOdQwP9OoUh3K8D9XobWajNVSkKUEUy1oJeFYZek9BHMtT9NCnpDIAs5bQ/ lRnsxSM4ZklUyS7hmL1UGi9is7B7fJWHpQ8JKgXGA2UYo6RN980m2tQK/zZhRHs3 2desuMIHwAfDbYekfp+uhoDEcG7GyFSaHUpk5/Kapxxs025XAJ/J9l/R59CuwAs8 Zh42Cw2BRwz0kQnUbmgf2LNuWwtOzXG6UdNU7BOo7mLMZ81SrgTJZ1IvcTR700VB oxVXZcoEx/9tpHTGVGTmXUcwzztPxFJJgzRPC+XYPUBeNdPWtVnexNpAKLJqJeRe Z0DYl55t0ydS8fwndwSS3E2cYwPb0kC9N4jy4m1esrBT/5q4u2G45zgHpvt+vLXN ckDzElsR/DIjbLhv4Vfg =xWTg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-qa] Early elections for new QA lead Dane Smith <c1pher@g.o>