| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 3 |
> > * Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> >> Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> And we have a new member: christel. |
| 6 |
> >> Actually according to convention you can't just join a project; you |
| 7 |
> >> usually need to ask the team and they kind of need to accept you. So my |
| 8 |
> >> question is, what are your intentions for the QA project Christel? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Would be nice to know, but the QA GLEP says that only current lead |
| 11 |
> > needs to approve. He did. |
| 12 |
> > The team selects the lead at any time. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Actually if you review the alias she voted for him, so how was she |
| 15 |
> approved prior to him being lead; if we had no lead prior to spb? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Nopes. I think you will find that with qa as many other alias a lot of |
| 18 |
non team members are on the alias out of curiousity. qa@g.o |
| 19 |
currently has 26 developers on it, not all of which are part of the QA |
| 20 |
team. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; |
| 23 |
> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the |
| 24 |
> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. |
| 25 |
> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd |
| 26 |
> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at |
| 27 |
> finding me magically added. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list |
Archives