Gentoo Archives: gentoo-qa

From: Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@g.o>
To: gentoo-qa@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:15:57
Message-Id: 1157508900.6424.216.camel@gaspode
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: A new lead (spb) and a new member (christel) by Alec Warner
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:08 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 02:45 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 19:39 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > <snip> > >>> I'm not trying to be a nagger here, but even if he did approve her; > >>> where is the mail saying so? I'd prefer more transparency than just the > >>> lead randomly adding someone and not informing the rest of the team. > >>> God knows if I tried to join some other teams (hahaha mips, not like I'd > >>> get the leads approval) the entire team would be rather dismayed at > >>> finding me magically added. > > > > Incidentally, if you have a problem with me, why not come out and say it > > rather than using everything you can find as an excuse to attack me > > under the guise of following procedure? > > If you'd rather not discuss it face to face, I'd have no objections to > > you asking for a third party to help mediate. But please stop this > > puerile (something)ery. > > > > > > I don't; I'd prefer a "Hey this person is joining the team to do thing > X" then just randomly discovering additions to the team. Tis how we end > up with projects full of people that don't do anything in the first place.
That I suspect is very true, and I agree. I'm sure it was on his TODO list. :) -- gentoo-qa@g.o mailing list