| 1 |
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:55:07 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> What this bug is about is rather the kind of errors that I've commented |
| 3 |
> on in [1], [2] and [3] which is that they _may_ be related to macros or |
| 4 |
> functions that are not declared/defined by the current set of library |
| 5 |
> dependencies, and would then lead to unresolved undefined symbols, and |
| 6 |
> thus, to runtime failure. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
or: |
| 9 |
- the return value is larger than an "int", and thus possibly truncated |
| 10 |
- the func requires 3 args, but user passes some other number, and compiler |
| 11 |
cannot flag it |
| 12 |
- the user passes args in the incorrect order and the compiler cant check it |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives