1 |
On 29.07.2013 22:38, Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
>> The alternative here is the automated testing that I've talked about with |
3 |
>> others on FOSDEM and Prague last year, but that still needs to be done. |
4 |
>> Amongst other testing, the idea would be to pick the latest ISO and boot it |
5 |
>> on some virtualization platform and catch the console output to ensure it |
6 |
>> booted successfully and not tests failed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Some recent problems have involved linux-firmware being broken. I |
9 |
> don't think virtualization will help notice that, e.g., the Tigon 3 |
10 |
> firmware is missing. |
11 |
|
12 |
Ideally, you'd use virtualization and some concrete physical platforms |
13 |
in parallel. For virtualization, KVM Qemu might be quick to get |
14 |
results, I think I used something like |
15 |
|
16 |
-append 'earlyprintk=serial,keep' -serial file:/abs/path/log/file |
17 |
|
18 |
previously to log the full console output from inside a KVM machine. |
19 |
That could be the base of a regression test suite. |
20 |
|
21 |
Best, |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Sebastian |