Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: Heinrich Wendel <lanius@g.o>
Cc: Kumba <kumba@g.o>, Gentoo-Base-System <base-system@g.o>, gentoo-releng@l.g.o, ppc@g.o, alpha@g.o, ia64@g.o, sparc@g.o, mips@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-releng] Re: binutils-2.14.90.0.7-r4
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:35:20
Message-Id: 1074429515.8472.200.camel@nosferatu.lan
1 On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 14:12, Heinrich Wendel wrote:
2
3 > > > x86, I've had no problems really. Just we need to get the new etcat
4 > > > version out because gcc-3.3.2-r5 scans for the @guard symbols, and older
5 > > > etcat versions do not work with the newer 2.0.50 portage, causing the
6 > > > ebuild to fail (this has been my experience on sparc64 actually, but I
7 > > > would not be surprised for this to popup up elsewhere for those who
8 > > > haven't upgraded gentoolkit yet (like me)).
9 > >
10 > > Right, lanius (whoever), any eta on the new etcat?
11 >
12 > /me wonders why he gets this mail
13 >
14 > I'm not in charge of gentoolkit, I think genone and karltk are.
15 >
16
17 Yes, but I assumed you wrote etcat, or at least commited it. If
18 you have a working version, then we can check with karltk or genone ...
19 If not, you could point us to the correct person?
20
21
22 Thanks,
23
24 --
25
26 Martin Schlemmer
27 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
28 Cape Town, South Africa

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature