| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Friday 30 April 2004 02:39 pm, John Davis wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I respectfully disagree, quite strongly actually. Although we did not |
| 7 |
> complete any of the feature request, which will be something that we |
| 8 |
> have to work on for 2004.2 (that is why I started the process so early), |
| 9 |
> we did get the release out on time and complete. Every release up to |
| 10 |
> 2004.1 was late and broken; 1.4 was almost vaporware and 2004.0 was |
| 11 |
> late. We accomplished something that has never been done with Gentoo |
| 12 |
> before, and I see that as something to be proud of (not to say that we |
| 13 |
> have an enormous amount of room to improve). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Zhen i have much respect for the work your doing on livecds now, but are you |
| 18 |
really so blind to the quality? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ive also seen notes that second kernel will be removed from future releases |
| 21 |
(if we cant fix it remove it) , also framebuffer/bootsplash will be removed.. |
| 22 |
(same thing , cant fix it remove it). If all of Gentoo did this, in a few |
| 23 |
years portage would be 2 ebuilds and a few scripts.. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The process needs to slow down a bit. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
And btw this is not just personal feelings, ive had almost all ppl touching |
| 28 |
x86 livecds ask for help. |
| 29 |
Bob |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQFAksAAxJgsCy9JAX0RAuj/AJ9xsXAlPd5YxjSANqUBJN3YbcemgACdGPhg |
| 34 |
vHwXMYzuWhK4M9buW+GrXG4= |
| 35 |
=exn/ |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-releng@g.o mailing list |
Archives