Gentoo Archives: gentoo-releng

From: Sylvain Alain <d2_racing@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:36:07
Message-Id: BAY132-W38D2B9B616A4DD4450F658D6340@phx.gbl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 by Andrew Gaffney
Hi Andrew, and what about if the Gentoo devs release after 3 months a new tarball for the new user...if will remove the need to update their box and also, maybe it's a good idea to refresh the tarball between 2 majors profiles..


> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:33:01 -0600 > From: agaffney@g.o > To: gentoo-releng@l.g.o > Subject: Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 > > Sylvain Alain wrote: > > Hi, I'm not sure if I'm on the right list, but I would like to know what > > do you think of the Daniel Robbins Idea of creating tarball stages every > > weeks are so : > > > > For now it's a good idea because of the expat problem and the age of the > > official tarball, but in future can Gentoo provide more up to date > > tarball for the users ? > > Please, please don't top-post. > > The problem with drobbins's weekly stage tarballs is that there is absolutely > zero QA done on them. We can't with good conscience release completely untested > stage tarballs out into the wild. We also don't want to have to deal with bug > reports that would stem from this. > > -- > Andrew Gaffney > Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator > -- > gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list >


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-releng] Call for feature request for 2008.0 Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o>