1 |
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:37 +0200, Peter Weber wrote: |
2 |
> And why you include stage3? Stage3 within a network based installation |
3 |
> is complet nonsens. |
4 |
|
5 |
First, stage3 is the *only* supported installation, so it makes perfect |
6 |
sense. Second, a stage3 tarball can be used via both the Installer (it |
7 |
has a URI browser) *and* on the command line for network-based installs. |
8 |
Finally, I don't answer to you. I've already explained on another list |
9 |
to you that we are *not* interested in supporting *your* idea of what a |
10 |
network-less installation should be, and have moved on to something we |
11 |
consider better. |
12 |
|
13 |
At this point, you have three choices. |
14 |
|
15 |
#1. Accept it |
16 |
#2. Build it yourself |
17 |
#3. Go away |
18 |
|
19 |
I honestly don't care which one you do, but the one that I will not |
20 |
allow you to do is to try to force us to do something we do not wish to |
21 |
do with our volunteer time. |
22 |
|
23 |
Good day, |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Chris Gianelloni |
27 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
28 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
29 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
30 |
Gentoo Foundation |