1 |
On 04/02/2008, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@×××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Alex Howells wrote: |
3 |
> > I wasn't attempting to state "This does not work!"; merely expressing |
4 |
> > that ~arch isn't really a supported platform. Dropping back to stable |
5 |
> > isn't really a viable route, once your system is ~arch there's quite a |
6 |
> > lot to go <BOOM!> if you tried to globally undo that. Wanna try it? |
7 |
> > ;) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I've never had to, but yes, it's nearly impossible. |
10 |
|
11 |
.. and this is why I think there should be big warning signs :) |
12 |
|
13 |
> Gentoo in the enterprise? Nobody ever got fired for buying RHEL or |
14 |
> Novell SuSE. It's possible Ubuntu will get to that point someday, but |
15 |
> you aren't going to see a "pure community" distro like Gentoo, Debian, |
16 |
> or even Fedora any place where there's even a whiff of risk aversion. |
17 |
> Enterprise IT departments want to be able to call up a sales rep and |
18 |
> threaten to quit buying if the vendor doesn't come in and fix stuff *now*! |
19 |
|
20 |
I actually know of several server farms and supercomputers which run |
21 |
it right now, and I know plenty of universities with 1000+ systems |
22 |
deployed too; my alma mater uses very basic installs of Gentoo Linux |
23 |
for X11 to connect to Citrix, it works very well, is easy to update en |
24 |
masse, etc. They've got a mixture of Solaris 10 and Gentoo deployed on |
25 |
servers too. |
26 |
|
27 |
Maybe I'm being incorrect when classing 'enterprise' as start-ups, but |
28 |
I wasn't excluding them from my previous statement - what I'd like is |
29 |
increased adoption in business generally, we already see some shops |
30 |
running Gentoo Linux because they've realized their "in house" guys |
31 |
are just as good as the some of the chaps on RHELs support line. ;) |
32 |
|
33 |
> > I'd have liked to see two main things happen with Gentoo 2008.0: |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > * Get rid of stage3 - all our install documentation works with |
36 |
> > just the stage3 right now, we don't "support" stage1/2 |
37 |
> > installs yet users are /always/ asking on IRC and MLs |
38 |
> > for help with a stage1 install because they think it's l33t. |
39 |
> > Remove it from mirrors, put it in /experimental, whatever; |
40 |
> > we need the stage1/2 somewhere for lotsa reasons, but lets |
41 |
> > make it less obvious to weed out those clueless ricers. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Did you mean to say "get rid of stage3" or "get rid of stage1 and |
44 |
> stage2?" Is there a way to do an install without stage3? |
45 |
|
46 |
I meant stop shipping stage1 and stage2 in the releases directory. |
47 |
Already it's not mentioned in documentation, but it's presence in the |
48 |
place we tell folks to download stuff from makes people go, "I wanna |
49 |
do that! l33t!". |
50 |
|
51 |
There are only a few corner cases where you *should* install from |
52 |
stage1, notably if you want to significantly alter the bootstrap |
53 |
process. Given how stage3 gets 'out of date' pretty fast after a |
54 |
release due to us having a fairly dynamic tree though, if you wanted |
55 |
to make core changes, it's going to be just as fast (and 10x more |
56 |
supported) to emerge -e world. |
57 |
|
58 |
That leaves: |
59 |
|
60 |
* Ship 'em in /experimental to all our mirrors |
61 |
* Keep 'em on one of our Infra boxes at $sponsor |
62 |
|
63 |
Don't think there's much between those choices, given stage1+2 |
64 |
shouldn't really need to be downloaded a great deal. In terms of |
65 |
traffic volume, the biggest 'hit' seems to be folks downloading |
66 |
LiveCDs + stage3. |
67 |
|
68 |
> > * Have some warning banners on ~arch and a toggle option for |
69 |
> > make.conf to disable them. There are *far* too many people |
70 |
> > on IRC suggesting newbies adopt ~arch, and they do so.. :( |
71 |
> > They've got no clue what it means, then they bitch/whine |
72 |
> > when they hit ABI issues or other problems and blame Gentoo. |
73 |
> > Don't document the toggle option in the Install Manual ;) |
74 |
[snip..] |
75 |
> > Suggested value for disabling the big flashy warning banners :P |
76 |
> > MODIFYING_ACCEPT_KEYWORDS_MAY_BREAK_MY_BOX_AND_I_UNDERSTAND_THIS |
77 |
> |
78 |
> Yep ... fine with me. |
79 |
|
80 |
I'm not suggesting we remove flexibility here, just make it *very* |
81 |
obvious when you might be doing something daft. If power users want |
82 |
to run ~arch with XFS on a desktop system that doesn't have a UPS, |
83 |
they're stupid, but we shouldn't restrain them from doing that :) |
84 |
-- |
85 |
gentoo-releng@l.g.o mailing list |